![]() Deciding to ragequit because they didn't get their way. So I'm hoping we'll find out something more, big about the traitor in the future, because otherwise. Duncan even took a huge risk in sending Gared to the Wall. Royland was presented as a veteran, who'd been with House Forrester through thick and thin, and despite his militant and uhh "trigger happy" attitude, he never thought of nothing but what is best for the House.Īnd Duncan was someone SO deeply trusted that he was the only one allowed to know about the North Grove. So it felt strange that they'd become traitors, no matter what kind of a weak f*ckwad the new lord was. They were both presented as intensely loyal, not to mention very trusted people to Lord Gregor. weird, underwhelming, out of place? To me, neither Duncan or Royland had a good-enough motivation. I felt the identity of the traitor, either way, was really. For those who have not played through Episode 5, stop right now: Spoilers ahead. ![]() Okay, so, as a general discussion on the reveal of the traitor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |